A Very Late Review: Tanu Weds Manu Returns

tanu weds manu returns

Not to sound picky, but there’s something about grammatically wrong movie titles that gets my goat.

Like a Sohail Khan movie released a decade ago named ‘I Proud To Be Indian’. I understand that the story, the production, the budget – is yours. But how much does it cost to add an ‘am’ in the middle. Or may be a comma?

The makers of this film could have named it ‘Tanu Weds Manu Again’, or ‘Tanu Weds Manu After Returning’. ‘Tanu Weds Manu Returns’ makes no sense.

Right. Now that I’ve gotten that off my chest, here’s what I thought about the movie.

*

There are a few things Anand L. Rai gets bang-on in his films.

Casting, for one.  If one were to forget his first two forgettable films, director Anand L. Rai has a knack for casting people who fit the role, even though it might not seem right in the beginning.

Another thing he gets right, is the sharp dialogues. His films are laced with interesting lines, mouthed by interesting characters. Tanu Weds Manu is no exception.

After reading the universally rave reviews, I got to watch the film very late in the day. And I’m sorry to say, I wasn’t blown away by it or anything.

I know the usual argument. That it is better than your average Bollywood fare. But somehow, over the years of watching, analysing, and writing about cinema, that lame description doesn’t cut it for me any more.

Tanu Weds Manu does the classic Bollywood trick of raising your expectations and slamming it down on your head with a gigantic Thud! at the end. I had problems with Manu’s choices in the film, but I’ll get to that later.

Deepak Dobriyal is a fine, fine actor. But I’m tired of seeing him as the hero’s sidekick. He has done it in OmkaraTanu Weds Manu, and this one again. But if you’ve watched him in Teen They Bhai, or Shaurya, you’ll know he’s capable of much, much more.

Kangana Ranaut is undoubtedly the hero of the film. She reminds you of the time when Sridevi would make films with less famous actors and carry the film on her shoulders.

Having perfected the crazy-girl-with-big-heart role, Kangana nails the fiesty, if slightly cranky Tanu. As someone who has found her immensely watchable from her very first film, I am scared if it will get tiring after a point.

Which brings us to the second Kangana in the film – Kusum.

Tanu was probably an exaggerated stereotype on purpose. Because when Kusum comes on screen, she steals your heart. Ranaut puts so much into the role, that you forget it’s the same person at one point. Kusum is vulnerable, attractive, strong, and steals your breath away.

And when Manu (Madhavan playing the nice guy, a role he’s been playing since he was a sperm) has to choose between the two, is when my problems with the film really begin. Why would he choose the crazy, psycho, alcoholic Tanu when he has gone through the pains of getting married to another lovely girl?

I’m not trying to be Mohan Bhagwat here, but let’s do a comparison.

Tanu is moody, clearly dim-witted, critical and caustic, and uses men in her life because they are attracted to her. She also walks about the streets at night after getting drunk, and eats chow mein, which a Sanskari Indian girl shouldn’t do. 

Kusum on the other hand, is independent, caring and mature. She doesn’t shy away from fighting for her love, and most importantly – is superfantastico, smoldering hot. She’s so hot, she makes Tanu seem like a loud, insecure starlet in comparison. Then why would Manu choose Tanu over her?

I failed to put my head around this.

Ah! Because, love.

Love is supposed to be blind, and biased, and doesn’t need to follow logic or reasoning. I’m hardly an authority on love. Like Mahishasura, most of my decisions are driven by lust.

Love might be blind, and deaf, and HIV positive, but all that love bullshit is what ruins Tanu Weds Manu Returns as a finished product. If Manu chose Komal, I’d have been impressed. But with its present ending, the film is just about Meh!

I am waiting for the director to release a third part – Tanu Weds Manu and Returns with Komal. 

#Threesome

#SorryIKnowThatsATerribleThought

#KarnaPadtaHai

**********

11 thoughts on “A Very Late Review: Tanu Weds Manu Returns

  1. Samantha

    I was just looking at your A Very Late Review: Tanu Weds Manu ReturnsHeartranjan site and see that your site has the potential to become very popular. I just want to tell you, In case you didn’t already know… There is a website service which already has more than 16 million users, and the majority of the users are interested in websites like yours. By getting your site on this service you have a chance to get your site more visitors than you can imagine. It is free to sign up and you can read more about it here: http://www.go2im.com/a/1mh3v – Now, let me ask you… Do you need your website to be successful to maintain your business? Do you need targeted traffic who are interested in the services and products you offer? Are looking for exposure, to increase sales, and to quickly develop awareness for your website? If your answer is YES, you can achieve these things only if you get your website on the service I am talking about. This traffic service advertises you to thousands, while also giving you a chance to test the service before paying anything. All the popular websites are using this network to boost their readership and ad revenue! Why aren’t you? And what is better than traffic? It’s recurring traffic! That’s how running a successful site works… Here’s to your success! Find out more here: http://url.laspas.gr/ak

    Reply
  2. Ramsu

    You nailed a whole bunch of points in this one: the criminal misuse of Deepak Dobriyal (who stole the show from under nearly everyone’s nose in Shaurya), Manu’s problematic choices (not that I’m particularly thrilled with Kusum choosing Manu, for that matter)… nice review!

    Question: Shouldn’t there have been no space between ‘may’ and ‘be’ in your second paragraph? I only ask because you seem like the sort of guy who is particular about grammar 🙂

    As for the title itself, “Tanu Returns, Manu Weds” would’ve been more accurate (not to mention grammatically pleasing), don’t you think?

    Reply
  3. flyingonemptythoughts

    Great review! The movie was such a laugh. Kangana rocked it.Can’t say the same for Maddy , he went overboard with the nice boring guy, wanted to strangle him! Kusum character was just stunning. The opening scene just had me floored.

    Reply
  4. pragya sugandha

    Hi Heartranjan ….. I love you blogs and keep following it , but i disagree on this one.
    I feel the whole essence has nothing to do with marriage wins at end theory and I totally agree on your stand on Mr. Manu, he is totally and completely confused but not at the end by choosing Tanu and not Kusum, but from the beginning I feel. How can you fall in love with someone when you are still pondering over your divorce and at the top of it with a girl with similar face like your soon to be ex wife. At least “Jimmy shergil’s(Sorry don’t remember the name) character admits that he agreed to marry kusum w/o meeting her because she resembled Tanu.

    And the other part, Yes Kusum is adorable , but I still Love Tanu, her unapologetic brashness, and in your face flirting. Common let us stop being a hypocrite If a guy does the same thing he is a dude / or confused. The Girl can do the same thing to get back her confidence and Tanu’s character has been like that from the beginning and Manu married her after knowing everything about her. You can fall in love with a girl like that and then try to tame her. That’s not how it works out.

    So yes I loved Kusum and she is definitly better than Tanu as a person… but I love Tanu more for her faults, her loudness, her simplicity at being direct and straightforwardness
    And as far as Mr. Manu is concerned, i feel both the girls should have ditched him. He is really confused.

    Reply
  5. Kamal Krishna Patnaik

    ‘Love might be blind, and deaf, and HIV positive, but all that love bullshit is what ruins Tanu Weds Manu Returns as a finished product.’
    ROFL…..
    No one(including myself) can describe my feelings, after watching the movie, better than this statement. Great review(as always)!

    Reply
  6. Medhavi

    Komal nahin Kusum in the end.
    Well even I thought, he should have chosen Kusum, but the movie had a story in which “marriage” has been the topic, the reason they showed their union in the end is because married couples may be happy, maybe unhappy lekin “laut ke buddhu ghar ko aaye”

    Reply
  7. Dinesh Aditya

    Q. Where has the grammatical problem of the title of this movie been pointed out in a film review before?

    A. Sample from Bharadwaj Rangan’s review on the the oddness of the title:
    “What an odd title: Tanu Weds Manu Returns. Considering the audience just needs to be told that this is a sequel, was Tanu and Manu Again unavailable? Tanu Weds Manu Returns sounds like Tanu weds and Manu returns. The blue-penciller in me kept wanting to insert a comma midway”
    https://baradwajrangan.wordpress.com/2015/05/23/tanu-weds-manu-returns-a-romance-that-struggles-to-measure-up-to-its-heroines-performance/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.